On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 12:45 -0700, carl hansen wrote: > While you're at it, could you check gnucobol? sig265sum.sig didn't compute > for me
It's working fine for me...So, same sanity checks as before? Here's what I've got: bd319c0d001e85835c8501ad74c9de0052fe82b8a38b4530f41b49b2af028b9d download/gnu-cobol-1.1.tar.gz 204195d31af9e233450085cd957743d552928c3bb14193aac7b43cd0dca6dc02 download/gnu-cobol-1.1.tar.gz.sig I pushed the fix for the libgcrypt checksums. -brandon
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
