Follow-up Comment #1, bug #65886 (group groff):
Not all repeated words are erroneous. You have to look at the context.
[comment #0 original submission:]
> ! ./man/groff.7.man: 5736 --> to
> ! ./man/groff_diff.7.man: 772 --> to
These are both copies of the same sentence, the relevant phrase of which is
"drawing position that GNU troff automatically returned to to close the
figure." It a shorthand (but perfectly idiomatic) way of writing "drawing
position to which GNU troff automatically returned in order to close the
figure."
The rest do seem to be typos.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?65886>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
