Follow-up Comment #5, bug #62300 (group groff):
[comment #2 comment #2:]
> The input sequence '\[u00A0]' is _syntactically_ valid...but
> like '\[uFFFF]' and '\[u0000]', it's not _meaningful_
Dear future me: next time you run across this comment and think "I responded
to this somewhere" but can't remember where: it's in comment 13 of bug #58930.
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?62300>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
