Follow-up Comment #4, bug #46914 (project groff):
[comment #1 comment #1:]
> But bug #60731 raises the question of whether the actual bug
> above is in the output of the second or the third .ce call. _One_
> of them seems to be wrong, since they handle the same situation
> (input longer than the requested output line) differently (one
> breaking the line, one overflowing the line length).
Further analysis in yonder 60731 seems to indicate that the breaking is the
intended behavior (my assumption when I initially reported this).
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?46914>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via Savannah
https://savannah.gnu.org/
