Paul Eggert wrote: > This reminds me of something I've noticed before: GCC and Clang disagree > about how to detect which sanitization forms are in use, which leads to some > duplication of code in Gnulib, and also I suspect leads to Gnulib not detect > some forms of sanitization that it should because it's kinda inconvenient. I > installed the attached patches to work around the problems that I found in > this area: they let other parts of Gnulib assume the GCC way of doing things.
Thanks. That's a nice simplification. I got tired too of this __has_feature dance, necessary for clang versions < 22. Bruno
