Hi Adhemerval,

Thank you for working on this.

> it breaks our previous policy of not adding retroactively symbols.

Why not version 2.44.1 ? I guess the symbol versioning mechanism must support
version numbers of the form <major>.<minor>.<subminor>, because in the past,
some symbols were assigned to versions GLIBC_2.3.3 or GLIBC_2.3.4, for
instance.

The patch looks good to me (from reviewing it; I haven't tested it).

Bruno




Reply via email to