At 2026-08-03T01:08:32+0200, Arsen Arsenović wrote: > Alejandro Colomar <[email protected]> writes: > > Most programmers can live in the safe bubble of <string.h>: those > > functions always require a string as input, and always provide a > > string as output. Plain and simple. It's difficult to write bugs > > when using those. > > > > That's the rationale. > > I do not follow. > > C has no namespaces, let alone qualified imports.
That's true. > The name of a header providing some function is thus inconsequential. Then why not have one official big header file for the whole standard? #include <stdlibc.h> When you answer that to your own satisfaction, I suspect you'll have little trouble following Alex's argument. ...which doesn't mean you'll agree with it. Regards, Branden
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
