On 2026-04-13 03:09, Bruno Haible wrote:
Anyone disagrees?
Then, let's hope that the glibc people evaluate the legal risk in the same
way and don't reject the patch...
This a pretty clear-cut case of benign use of an LLM, as far as
copyright violations are concerned.
Even a lawyer would tell you their advice in this area cannot be relied
upon 100%, for the reasons you mentioned (no court rulings so far,
etc.). In the meantime as long as we err on the side of caution (as we
are certainly doing here) we should be OK.
