Hi Collin, > Bruno, can you please check the attached patch?
Yes, this patch looks good. > The value of $ac_cv_search_nanosleep will remain "no" since we do not > add winpthreads to the library search. Then we check if a static inline > function allows a simple program to compile. If so, then we have to use > rpl_nanosleep instead of nanosleep for our definition. Yes, this is how I would expect this code to work. > I tested it using Tim's Dockerfile and 'make check' passes using Wine. Please commit it. Thanks a lot! Bruno
