Re: [PATCH] Prefer readlink to lstat+S_ISLNK when easy

[Bruno Haible via Gnulib discussion list]

Paul Eggert wrote:
> > How should we call it? islnkat? islinkat?
> 
> I would suggest issymlinkat to avoid confusion with hard links. 
> ("symlinkpat" would be bad as it sounds like you're patting a symlink.)

Thanks, I agree with that. (And "symlinkatp" would be a strange accumulation
of two suffixes.)

I'll prepare a patch for that.

Bruno