Mitch Capper wrote: > Right now filename has no > dependencies but doing this adds basename. I understand circular > dependencies can be handled, but am I fine to just add a new dependency on > a core module like this?
No, it's better if 'filename' stays as a module without dependencies. Therefore, every place where you meant to use LAST_SLASH_IN_PATH, consider adding the dependency to 'basename-lgpl' there. Bruno
