El 14/4/25 a las 16:36, Eric Blake escribió:
Also, I see two
uses of @value{UPDATED} in m4.texi, but your patch only removed one;
is the other one not an issue?
You are right. I don't know. For some reason, only the patch I posted before
was necessary at least for the 1.4.19 version, as shown here:
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/unstable/amd64/m4.html
Those tests check the produced .debs (m4 and m4-doc in this case).
The m4 package contains the info manual, and the m4-doc package contains
the manual in html format.
If the variation only happened in the .dvi or the .pdf, for example,
the above tests would still mark the Debian package as reproducible,
as we don't distribute those artifacts in binary packages.
I have not tested the new snapshot yet for reproducibility issues, but
will probably try for the next snapshot.
Thanks.
