The installer from https://osdn.net/projects/mingw/ is the same as found in https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw/ (except for possible difference in versions) and the Wikipedia article points to the former website (mingw.org website is no longer alive). This installer provides both `mingw-*` (gcc, binutils) and `msys-*` (bash, autotools, etc.) packages. I am using its `msys.bat` to start the shell.
I also would like to notice that mingw32 (MinGW) has not been updated for a few years as of now. ________________________________ From: bug-automake-bounces+maiddaisuki=outlook....@gnu.org <bug-automake-bounces+maiddaisuki=outlook....@gnu.org> on behalf of Bruno Haible via Bug reports for Automake <bug-autom...@gnu.org> Sent: Monday, February 3, 2025 7:56 PM To: bug-gnulib@gnu.org <bug-gnulib@gnu.org>; Kirill Makurin <maiddais...@outlook.com> Cc: 75...@debbugs.gnu.org <75...@debbugs.gnu.org>; Karl Berry <k...@freefriends.org> Subject: bug#75939: setting $MSYS2_ARG_CONV_EXCL in compile script? Kirill Makurin wrote: > I applied patches and they work for Msys2. > > I also tested it with (what I assume is) "Msys-based MinGW" > (https://osdn.net/projects/mingw/) and it fails. Its `uname -s` reports > `MINGW32_NT-6.2` and it has `MSYSTEM` set , and it lacks `cygpath`. > ... > I explicitly set `file_conv` to `mingw` in compile just for testing with this > MinGW and there are no issues with double conversion. Thanks for testing. In the download area of https://osdn.net/projects/mingw/, I cannot see an "Msys-based MinGW". Rather, the page says "This is the official download site for the latest packages originating from the MinGW.OSDN Project, (formerly the MinGW.org Project; however, that domain is no longer associated with this project)." Maybe the mix between the original MinGW and MSYS occurred on your machine? Anyway, here's an update of the patch series, that should make things work also in this situation (regardless how it originated). I wouldn't want to test for the presence of 'cygpath' _without_ also testing $MSYSTEM, because that could malfunction for people who access the original MinGW binaries through a Cygwin environment (which is another mix-up that people might do). Bruno
