On Cygwin 2.9.0 I'm seeing a test failure: FAIL: test-xstrtol.sh This patch avoids the failure, acknowledging that the results here are different on different Cygwin versions.
2025-01-05 Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org> xstrtol, xstrtoll tests: Avoid test failure after 2024-07-25 change. * tests/test-xstrtol.c (main): Update expected test results regarding Cygwin 2.9.0. diff --git a/tests/test-xstrtol.c b/tests/test-xstrtol.c index a8291bb937..fe68dc00e6 100644 --- a/tests/test-xstrtol.c +++ b/tests/test-xstrtol.c @@ -70,13 +70,13 @@ main (int argc, char **argv) /* Test an invalid base (undefined behaviour, as documented in xstrtol.h). Reported by Alejandro Colomar. */ -#if !defined _MSC_VER +#if !(defined __CYGWIN__ || defined _MSC_VER) { const char input[] = "k"; char *endp = NULL; __strtol_t val = -17; strtol_error s_err = __xstrtol (input, &endp, -1, &val, "k"); -# if !(defined __GLIBC__ || defined __CYGWIN__ || is_GNULIB_strtol) +# if !(defined __GLIBC__ || is_GNULIB_strtol) ASSERT (s_err == LONGINT_OK); ASSERT (endp == input + 1); ASSERT (val == 1024);