On 2024-10-19 05:26, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
Yeah, it's more likely this one:
Thanks. I verified this by inspecting the diffs[1] from glibc 2.1 to 2.1.1. The suggestions I made in libc-alpha[2] for your draft tunables patch[3] should therefore be amended to say glibc version 2.1.1 (1999) not version 2.6 (2007).
[1]: https://ftp.gnu.org/pub/gnu/glibc/glibc-2.1-2.1.1.diff.gz [2]: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2024-October/160750.html [3]: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2024-October/160749.html
