Hi! Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org> schrieb am Sa., 17. Aug. 2024, 11:14:
> Hi Simon, > > > Ouch. Shouldn't we rename 'valgrind-tests' instead? > > ... > > Whatever problem appears if we rename > > 'valgrind-tests' to, say, 'valgrindtests' we could fix. > > 'valgrindtests' would be a hack. > > 'valgrind-support-for-tests' would have the same problem. > > 'test-support-with-valgrind' would reflect the meaning, but is a bit long. > > > The naming was a clever hack long time ago > > What did this naming attempt to achieve? > > > but this module always behaved bit weird > > (e.g., creating an empty gnulib tests/ sub-directory if a package > > doesn't use any gnulib test modules) > > This is fixed now. > What about the shell-based gnulib tool? Or should I consider that one deprecated? Thanks, Marc > So, IMO, there is no need to rename the module any more. > > Bruno > > > >
