Hi Bruno, > > The attached patch avoids those warnings. > > Thanks, but it does not do the right thing: *s[1] accesses the first character > of the string after s. What was meant was to access the second character of > the string at s; this needs to be written as (*s)[1].
Oof. You are absolutely right. What a difference some parenthesis make. > I'm committing this patch instead. Thank you for spotting the error in the proposed patch and pushing a fix so quickly. Markus