Hi Bruno, On 4/16/24 8:47 AM, Bruno Haible wrote: > Yes, they _can_ be made static, but they can also be left as-is. And so, > as a developer, you start to spend time considering whether to make a > function static or not. That time is not well spent.
We are in agreement there. PyCharm gives hints that you can make function static, but I ended up turning it off. That case was an easy example, but there is little benefit. In the first line of main we have 'info = GLInfo()' which is clear enough. > When a programmer, each time they define a function, they consider which > of the 13 variants is suitable or the best, they spend time on a thing > that is not necessary for the functioning of their program. LOL, that is a good example. I can't tell if there are any you missed because I haven't used C++ in ~5 years. > A workaround is to move the loop into a function, and then use > 'return' from different locations. True, I'll get around to fixing that break eventually. Atleast Python is fast enough that it doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things. Collin
