Hi Darshit,

> I will however concede that modern Python has a lot of syntactic sugar which 
> in a way detracts from Python's original charm of being extremely easy to 
> read and parse. So if we for example end up using complex generators and 
> comprehensions, it will make it hard for a lot of people to follow. Maybe 
> there's a balance we can tread there?

Good point, yes. We should add something about it in our small
coding style section.

I once had proposed that the use of C++ in GCC be limited [1][2].
But this did not happen, and you can see the results nowadays :-(

> P.S.: For those who'd like, there's a great Easter Egg in Python: `import 
> this`, which prints the "Zen of Python". Rules I think are great for 
> programming in general.

Funny :-)

Bruno

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc/2008-06/msg00554.html
[2] https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc/2008-06/msg00573.html




Reply via email to