On 2/12/24 5:09 AM, Bruno Haible wrote: > BOOL_WIDTH = 1, BOOL_MAX = 1 > with CC="gcc -std=gnu2x", but > BOOL_WIDTH = 8, BOOL_MAX = 1 > with CC="clang -std=gnu2x" (for all clang version 14 ... 17).
Same results with GCC 14 and Clang 19. > Apparently I had misinterpreted the meaning of BOOL_WIDTH. (Cf. > ISO C 23 § E.(3)). Today I learned. I was under the impression that BOOL_WIDTH would be the same as the underlying type (8-bit char for example). Am I misreading or would this be a Clang bug? Both ISO C 23 § 5.2.4.2.1 and Annex E seem to say BOOL_WIDTH must be exactly 1. That would also make the previous definition correct. :)
