Paul Eggert <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, I installed most of them, though with some changes as some fixes > need to be installed upstream first,
I saw you send one to texinfo. I think these are the ones that were reverted by some automatic things from other upstreams: https://github.com/jsoref/gnu-gnulib/commit/142ff39f17f846808d018a1eb5e43d5e9ee7d2e6 Will someone else manage pulling in those bits? Or am I responsible for that? > and others didn't seem to be needed > ("obsolescent" is a word and has a different meaning from "obsolete"). I'm aware they're distinct words, but I believe that `obsolete` is the appropriate term. obsolescent is about "becoming obsolete", but afaict all of the instances involve cases where something has declared a thing as in fact *being* obsolete as opposed to merely things which through (lack of) common usage are becoming obsolete. > Plus I fixed some nearby grammar issues. The additional "in the neighborhood" changes look great. > Attached is what I installed. Thanks, I pulled in the changes as https://github.com/jsoref/gnu-gnulib/commits/142ff39f17f846808d018a1eb5e43d5e9ee7d2e6 For the curious, these are the bits which weren't dropped when I rebased: https://github.com/jsoref/gnu-gnulib/compare/142ff39f17f846808d018a1eb5e43d5e9ee7d2e6...ab197e8f81389c3c2d27c8ebd5f9af0c516da479
