Paul Eggert wrote: > Unless I'm misunderstanding you things should work as-is, as > manywarnings should omit a -Wxxx option if gcc complains that it's not > supported.
It could be that a warning option is accepted by the front-end's option parser, but unknown to the #pragma handler. > And anyway manywarnings doesn't mention the relevant -Wxxx > options; they're merely implied by -fanalyzer (and are listed as such in > build-aux/gcc-warning.spec). OK, then I agree we're safe w.r.t. these options. Bruno
