Paul Eggert wrote: > > * Logically, there should also be definitions of > > PRIbN PRIbLEASTN PRIbFASTN PRIbMAX PRIbPTR > > in <inttypes.h>, but I do not see them in the latest complete PDF > > https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3088.pdf > > section 7.8.1.(3). > > * These macros are redundant anyway: > > Aren't they omitted because they would indeed be redundant?
Well, glibc has PRIb* already in <inttypes.h>. [1] Would Joseph Myers have added them if they were not in ISO C 23? Really, I find it hard to follow the evolution of a standard, without access to the latest complete document. Bruno [1] https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=2d4728e60621
