On Mon, 8 Mar 2021 at 00:14, Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org> wrote: > Hi Reuben, > > > NAME_MAX is defined in limits.h. > > No. POSIX [1] specifies that it may be omitted from <limits.h>, and > that pathconf (_PC_NAME_MAX) is the right way to access the maximum > length of a file name component. [2] >
Ah, thanks for setting me straight!
