Noah Misch wrote: > If https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/iconv.html used > "identical" to mean "same byte sequence", it would be requiring an ISO-8859-1 > => > UTF-8 conversion to increment the iconv() return value upon converting 0xA1 to > 0xC2 0xA1. Most implementations don't do that.
Yes. This proves that when this part of POSIX says "identical", they mean "equivalent". It's nonsense if a standard attempts to redefine terms, that are defined with a certain meaning across mathematics and computer science, in a different way. > > --- a/modules/iconv-h > > +++ b/modules/iconv-h > > @@ -46,7 +46,9 @@ endif > > MOSTLYCLEANFILES += iconv.h iconv.h-t > > > > Include: > > -<iconv.h> > > +#if HAVE_ICONV_H > > +# include <iconv.h> > > +#endif > > Doesn't this module cause the header to exist? No. I checked the code. Bruno
