Hi Jim, > > I tried to make it clear the last time we discussed this (long ago!) > > that I prefer to keep certain comments very near the function > > definition (and implementation).
Yes, I sort of remembered this. Therefore I asked for objections, and put you in CC. > > I disagree with the premise that hash_delete should be renamed. That's > > an API-breaking change. Yes, it's an API change. I applied the usual procedure for API changes in gnulib: add the new API, then wait for more than a year, before the old API can be removed. > That said, I will not object to your normalizing diffs. I'm confused now. Which of the three patches, or which parts of them, do you wish to see reverted? Bruno
