On 4/29/20 7:28 AM, Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen wrote: > I am wondering whether it makes sense to add two new modules, named > pure and const that define macros GL_PURE and GL_CONST, respectively
There's already _GL_ATTRIBUTE_PURE and _GL_ATTRIBUTE_CONST. Presumably you just want them exposed? (I confess that Emacs already uses the latter....)
