> Le 19 mai 2019 à 18:37, Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu> a écrit : > > Bruno Haible wrote: >> Also, for the use of 'static inline', you need an AC_REQUIRE([AC_C_INLINE]) >> in >> the module description. > > Better to avoid the use of the 'inline' keyword there. These days I suggest > avoiding 'inline' as compilers are pretty good at inlining automatically and > it's often not worth the hassle of human annotation. 'inline' has its uses > but this particular place isn't one of them.
I have no opinion about this, I just matched things I saw in gnulib. Actually, if it were C++, I would use only "inline", as it makes the symbol weak and forces the linker to keep a single copy. "static inline" would be nonsensical, and "inline" superior to "static" (which duplicates).
