Assaf Gordon wrote:
Adding new accepted formats is good, but rejecting (or changing the meaning of) currently-accepted formats is a much more problematic decision due to breaking existing programs.I think that before continuing, it should be discussed and decided whether this is acceptable or not (Paul, Jim?).
I'd rather not reject existing valid input unless there's a good reason. Is there one? I didn't see one in the original proposal (admittedly I didn't read it word for word).
