Hi Pavel, > > makes the IFS handling a bit more robust.
What I meant is that
save_IFS="$IFS"
for fpf_dir in $fpf_dirs
do
IFS="$save_IFS"
[Some more code]
done
IFS="$save_IFS"
is more robust than
save_IFS="$IFS"
for fpf_dir in $fpf_dirs
do
[Some more code]
done
IFS="$save_IFS"
because the [Some more code] may invoke word splitting, and as a programmer
I would expect this word splitting to be performed against the default IFS.
Bruno
