Hi, On Sat, 29 Dec 2018, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 05:23:09PM +0300, Ivan Zakharyaschev wrote: > > As for the SIGILL peculiarity, it has a reason in the Elbrus architecture. > No, this particular case (++*argv[argc]) has nothing to do with tagged memory, > I hope Ivan will share his findings here. I've done it. Thanks for your hints regarding a test for another kind of fault (SIGFPE) happenning speculatively, and regarding the hexadecimal values which are easy to detect visually (0xbad etc.)! -- Best regards, Ivan
