Paul Eggert wrote: > Revised proposed patch(es) attached. Looks good to me, except for one little thing:
> memcpy (dst, src, n); src and dst may overlap. Therefore memmove should be used instead of memcpy. Bruno
Paul Eggert wrote: > Revised proposed patch(es) attached. Looks good to me, except for one little thing:
> memcpy (dst, src, n); src and dst may overlap. Therefore memmove should be used instead of memcpy. Bruno