On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote: > I'm planning to script the > conversion of all the tags, but am trying to figure out if it is worth > back-dating the tags, and whether an unsigned annotated tag or a simpler > lightweight tag is the better thing to push in place of each tag that > gets corrected.
I have found that it is worth the small additional effort to back-date tags when doing that. Otherwise, they will all be misleadingly listed with the date of the conversion, and in some clients will be shown as "new".
