On 22/12/15 16:59, Paul Eggert wrote: > Pádraig Brady wrote: >> The attached patch skips the expected output check, >> for the two ahistorical entries, when tm_isdst is not set, >> and now passes on Darwin 14. > > The ahistorical entries strictly conform to the POSIX spec for TZ settings, > and > any POSIX or POSIX-like implementation should handle them correctly. So I > suppose we should report them as expected failures on Darwin and Solaris.
Oh Solaris has the same issue? So you mean warn, rather than fail or ignore in this case?
