KO Myung-Hun wrote: > BTW, do you mean to put URL into a source as a comment ?
Yes, this is what I mean. Rationale: Most gnulib developers don't have this reference handy, and a Google search did not provide the URL that you found. > > Reliability: Please don't ignore the return value of DosGetInfoBlocks. > > > > DosGetInfoBlocks() returns no values. Well, the URL that you showed describes its return value as "APIRET ulrc; /* Return Code. */" And the code in http://dennisdarland.com/russell_doc/html/os__dep_8c-source.html and in http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/JHI/perl-5.7.1/os2/OS2/Process/Process.xs do check the return value. And http://www.gladir.com/CODER/COS2/dosgetinfoblocks.htm describes that a return value == NO_ERROR means success. Even when (or especially when) you don't know under which conditions a system function can fail, you should check its return value. Code that does not follow this policy becomes unreliable and undebuggable, in the long run. Bruno
