That patch doesn't look right, as it would mishandle timeout == INFTIM, no?
Also, for larger patches like this, we'd need copyright papers signed; if that's something you'd like to do please let me know.
That patch doesn't look right, as it would mishandle timeout == INFTIM, no?
Also, for larger patches like this, we'd need copyright papers signed; if that's something you'd like to do please let me know.