Ondřej Bílka wrote:
> +XALLOC_INLINE void *
> +nmalloc (size_t n, size_t s)
> +{
> + if (xalloc_oversized (n, s))
> + xalloc_die ();
> + return xmalloc (n * s);
> +}This is the same as the existing xnmalloc, so why bother with a new name? Similarly for the other changes.
