Paul Eggert wrote: > +2013-04-29 Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu> > + > + tests: don't assume getdtablesize () <= 10000000 > + * modules/cloexec-tests: > + * modules/dup2-tests: > + * modules/dup3-tests: > + * modules/nonblocking-tests: > + * modules/posix_spawn_file_actions_addclose-tests: > + * modules/posix_spawn_file_actions_adddup2-tests: > + * modules/posix_spawn_file_actions_addopen-tests: > + * modules/unistd-safer-tests: > + Depend on the getdtablesize module. > + * tests/test-cloexec.c: > + * tests/test-dup-safer.c: > + * tests/test-dup2.c: > + * tests/test-dup3.c: > + * tests/test-fcntl.c: > + * tests/test-nonblocking.c: > + * tests/test-posix_spawn_file_actions_addclose.c: > + * tests/test-posix_spawn_file_actions_adddup2.c: > + * tests/test-posix_spawn_file_actions_addopen.c: > + Don't assume getdtablesize () <= 10000000. > +
Thanks for the change, Paul. Does this mean that you found a system on which it is larger, and that this is addressing some test failures?
