Karl Berry wrote: > regexprops-generic. The last one seems to be a mistake, > it should be fdl > > I seem to recall that the issue there was that regexprops-generic is > both documentation and code. Therefore neither GPL nor GFDL work, and > dual licensing seems like far too much trouble. > > The "unlimited" license text would also be ok, but I don't see that it's > worth changing. > > The alloca module > seems non-trivial but marked as public domain in the code. > > If it's still the same alloca, that is how it was originally written and > released (independently of GNU), decades ago.
Yes, it is still that same alloca.c.
