On 08/29/2012 02:07 PM, Michael Goffioul wrote:
> Thanks for that.
Your welcome. While in an unrelated meeting today it
popped into my head that the patch wasn't quite right,
as in C++ mode it defines _Bool to _Bool (via bool),
not to bool as it should. I pushed this further
patch to fix that:
>From 4d41ee34707396d205a8036a80da7c717e77a4f7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Eggert <egg...@penguin.cs.ucla.edu>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:43:04 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] * lib/stdbool.in.h (_Bool) [__cplusplus]: bool, not _Bool.
---
lib/stdbool.in.h | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/stdbool.in.h b/lib/stdbool.in.h
index 924c8ff..1261936 100644
--- a/lib/stdbool.in.h
+++ b/lib/stdbool.in.h
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@
#ifdef __cplusplus
# define _Bool bool
+# define bool bool
#else
# if defined __BEOS__ && !defined __HAIKU__
/* A compiler known to have 'bool'. */
@@ -114,8 +115,8 @@ typedef enum { _Bool_must_promote_to_int = -1, false = 0,
true = 1 } _Bool;
# endif
# endif
# endif
+# define bool _Bool
#endif
-#define bool _Bool
/* The other macros must be usable in preprocessor directives. */
#ifdef __cplusplus
--
1.7.11.4
