On 08/24/2012 03:33 PM, Karl Berry wrote: > The other file is fdl-1.2.texi; can that be fixed too? > > It really seems pointless to me to change an old version of a license > for such a cosmetic matter. I am loath to do so.
Sure, that's fine. Come to think of it, I don't know of anybody who's using fdl-1.2.texi. Perhaps we should remove it from gnulib, if it's not useful there?
