Bruno Haible wrote: ... >> My thought in having musl skip the test is to maximize performance of >> fdopen, assuming you might be using it in a situation like on a newly >> accept()ed network connection where every syscall counts (think >> multi-threaded httpd). For read-only fdopen, no syscalls are needed, > > Sounds reasonable. > > Here's a proposed patch to remove gnulib's unintentional requirement. > > > 2012-06-19 Bruno Haible <br...@clisp.org> > > fdopen: Allow implementations that don't reject invalid fd arguments. > * m4/fdopen.m4 (gl_FUNC_FDOPEN): Let the test pass if fdopen(-1,...) > succeeds. > Reported by Rich Felker <dal...@aerifal.cx>.
Thanks, Bruno. That patch looks perfect.
