On 06/18/12 05:52, Eric Blake wrote:
+ realtarget = canonicalize_filename_mode (target, CAN_MISSING);
Indeed, for this to be LGPL, we would have to change
canonicalize_filename_mode() to have a looser license, and I'm not sure
it is a wise idea to attempt that.
Indeed, perhaps just blanket license gnulib as LGPL?
It does seem like this several-times-a-year exercise of
"Oh, wait, we need this one LGPL-ed, too" is getting a
tad old. Maybe just me, but it seems like less bother
to just get it over with....
