Reuben Thomas wrote: > Since this file is trivial, would it be possible to give it an > all-permissive license? Someone has just (helpfully!) pointed out that > it shouldn't be in a BSD-licensed project I maintain, where it gets > pulled in by bootstrap.
Hi Reuben, I suppose you know that module is already LGPLv2+. Your request makes me wonder: If dummy's license is causing trouble, how can you use any nontrivial part of gnulib?
