Le 8 mai 2012 à 08:50, Jim Meyering a écrit :
> Eric Blake wrote:
> ...
>> Meanwhile, no one ever reviewed my proposed doc patch:
>>
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2012-04/msg00167.html
>
> Links to mailman-archived messages are hard to read
> the moment they contain a few "@" (address@obfuscated) signs,
> so texinfo is much easier to read via e.g., a gmane link:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs/30488
Indeed, thanks! Can't mailman be fixed?
> That patch/alternate-approach seems reasonable.
> I read through it and didn't see any problem.
There is small left over at the end of this paragraph.
+@item
+Determine the oldest version of @code{gettext} that you intend to
+support during development (at this time, gnulib recommends going no
+older than version 0.17). Run @code{autopoint} (not
+@code{gettextize}) to copy infrastructure into place (newer versions
+of gettext will install the older infrastructure that you requested).
+at the time the Gnulib snapshot was taken.
+
