Il 27/04/2012 10:47, Aharon Robbins ha scritto: > What I sent to the list a while back should do. If not, I will recreate > the patches but I can't promise they'll 100% follow Jim's standards.
Yes, please recreate them. >> I will once more write down my requirements for the patches to go in: >> >> 1) For regex, the patches should only touch !_LIBC sections of the code, >> so that they can be included in glibc too from the beginning; > > I believe this is the case already. Cool! >> 2) Later we can discuss affecting also the _LIBC sections of the code, >> including fnmatch. Until then, the patches should not affect the >> autoconf test for --with/without-included-regex. > > How do I check this? Easy, you do not touch *.m4 at all. :) Of course the behavior for --with and --without-included-regex will be different. However, I don't want the *default* choice made by autoconf to change; not yet, at least. > As a separate question, there are some bugs in glibc regex that I > have fixed and would like to submit patches for. Can I send them to > you offline? Sure. Paolo
