Le 16 avr. 2012 à 19:19, Jim Meyering a écrit :
> Good one.
> I prefer to use " +" rather than " *",
You are right, I started for grep, not grep -E.
> and suppose someone might say "See also ...", too,
> so added the (also +)? term.
>
> Do you think it's worth worrying about "Also see @xref...", too?
which includes "see @xref" :)
>
>
> diff --git a/top/maint.mk b/top/maint.mk
> index 2228a37..700dd1c 100644
> --- a/top/maint.mk
> +++ b/top/maint.mk
> @@ -838,6 +838,13 @@ sc_texinfo_acronym:
> halt='found use of Texinfo @acronym{}' \
> $(_sc_search_regexp)
>
> +# Avoid double "see" when contributed by @xref.
> +sc_texinfo_see_xref:
> + @prohibit='[Ss]ee +(also +)?@p?xref\{' \
> + in_vc_files='$(texinfo_suffix_re_)' \
> + halt='found use of "See @xref{}"' \
> + $(_sc_search_regexp)
That's good with me. I would be happy to be able to catch broken
lines though. It would be nice to be able to escape from the constraint
of grep per-line. In Texinfo "\n\n" is a better separator imho. How
about using Perl instead of Grep?
> +
> cvs_keywords = \
> Author|Date|Header|Id|Name|Locker|Log|RCSfile|Revision|Source|State
