On 07/21/11 16:00, Herb Wartens wrote:
> I am still seeing the fdatasync
> warnings though.
I just pushed this patch, which should fix things.
Please let me know if it doesn't. Looking around the net,
it appears that the fdatasync of Mac OS 10.7 is not effective,
so it's better to be safe here and act as if it doesn't exist.
>From 339613b6bdd8d4a51435cba9e903b8b5bb082da4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:40:03 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] dd, shred: use fdatasync only if declared
* m4/jm-macros.m4 (coreutils_MACROS): Use fdatasync only if declared.
MacOS X 10.7 has an fdatasync that is not declared, and is rumored to
be ineffective. (Bug#9141)
---
m4/jm-macros.m4 | 14 ++++++++++----
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/m4/jm-macros.m4 b/m4/jm-macros.m4
index 6e97221..58b000d 100644
--- a/m4/jm-macros.m4
+++ b/m4/jm-macros.m4
@@ -93,14 +93,20 @@ AC_DEFUN([coreutils_MACROS],
cu_PREREQ_STAT_PROG
# for dd.c and shred.c
- coreutils_saved_libs=$LIBS
- LIB_FDATASYNC=
+ #
+ # Use fdatasync only if declared. On MacOS X 10.7, fdatasync exists but
+ # is not declared, and is ineffective.
+ LIB_FDATASYNC=
+ AC_SUBST([LIB_FDATASYNC])
+ AC_CHECK_DECLS_ONCE([fdatasync])
+ if test $ac_cv_have_decl_fdatasync = yes; then
+ coreutils_saved_libs=$LIBS
AC_SEARCH_LIBS([fdatasync], [rt posix4],
[test "$ac_cv_search_fdatasync" = "none required" ||
LIB_FDATASYNC=$ac_cv_search_fdatasync])
- AC_SUBST([LIB_FDATASYNC])
AC_CHECK_FUNCS([fdatasync])
- LIBS=$coreutils_saved_libs
+ LIBS=$coreutils_saved_libs
+ fi
# Check whether libcap is usable -- for ls --color support
LIB_CAP=
--
1.7.4.4
