On 07/11/11 16:27, Bruno Haible wrote: > Huh? 'bool' is usable the same way in C and C++, with only minor semantic > differences.
I was thinking that in C, one must "#include <stdbool.h>" first. But we are digressing... > I would prefer if these files could use '_Noreturn' as well, for consistency, OK, thanks, I'll do it that way. Your other comments lead me to think that we should avoid having a stdnoreturn module, at least for now, to avoid the issues with [[noreturn]] versus noreturn. That is, we use _Noreturn everywhere, as _Noreturn seems to be more stable and there's no need for noreturn. I'll write up a revised patch along those lines shortly.
