On 07/11/11 15:18, Bruno Haible wrote:
> I was under the impression that the extra function declaration was needed
> because some GCC versions ignore the __attribute__ ((noreturn)) if it is found
> in the function definition. No?

That may have been a problem long ago, but it hasn't been true for
a while.  If we can discover exactly when it stopped being a problem,
we can alter the GCC version number in the _Noreturn macro to match
the first GCC version where it started working.  In the meantime I
wouldn't worry about it.

Reply via email to